Tilcock v. Budge’s Empirical Analysis
538 F.3d 1138 · 2008
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Williams v. Taylor · Woodford Warden v. Garceau · Davis v. Woodford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presume[s] that the state court’s findings of fact are correct unless [petitioner rebuts that presumption with clear and convincing evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spector v. Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.