Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security’s Empirical Analysis
538 F.3d 1250 · 2008
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc. (2013), Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. (2011)
17 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 49 U.S.C. § 114 · 49 U.S.C. § 44903 (Gerardo Hernandez Airport Security Act of 2015) · 49 U.S.C. § 46110 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Dennis v. Sparks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [he] purposefully directed his action (namely, his order to detain Ibrahim) at California; (2) [Dr.] Ibrahim's claim arises out of that action; and (3) jurisdiction is reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“prevent [those individuals] from boarding an aircraft, or take other appropriate action with respect to that individual,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“only provides a remedy against persons acting under color of state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stafne v. Zilly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.