Hubbard v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
538 F.3d 229 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Rochin v. People of California · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to be free from triple-celling or from sleeping on a mattress placed on the floor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In evaluating the constitutionality of conditions or restrictions of pretrial detention that implicated only the protection against deprivation of liberty without due process of law, we think the proper inquiry is whether those conditions amount to punishment of the detainee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. E. D. v. Sharkey“[W]hen pretrial detainees challenge their conditions of confinement, we must consider whether there has been a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. E. D. v. Sharkey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.