Limani v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
538 F.3d 25 · 2008
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bocova v. Gonzales · Lopez de Hincapie v. Gonzales · Sharari v. Gonzáles · Un v. Gonzáles · Ouk v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Justo v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.