Wamble v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 2701 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“establish a nexus between that status and the precise nature of the constitutional infringement alleged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pulido v. Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.