Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 FSUPP 881 - Silver v. Woolf

Silver v. Woolf’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2010

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692N (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Younger v. Harris · Hanson v. Denckla · Steffel v. Thompson · Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the statute regulates even-handedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits. . . . If a legitimate local purpose is found, then the question becomes one of degree. And the extent of the burden that will be tolerated will of course depend on the nature of the local interest *Page 287 involved, and on whether it could be promoted as well with a lesser impact on interstate activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.