Tolliver v. Mathas’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Fresh Cut, Inc. v. Fazli (1995), Horseshoe Hammond, LLC v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (2007)
3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129
Relies on Weil v. Neary · Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong · 170 Ind. App. 295 - Burger Man, Inc. v. Jordan Paper Products, Inc. · 172 Ind. App. 81 - Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co. · 181 Ind. App. 209 - Howard Dodge & Sons, Inc. v. Finn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(aln agent who commits a tortious act is equally liable with the principal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[d]etriment alone suffices as consideration,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Wlhere one party to an oral agreement has partially performed in reliance on the contract and it would be perpetrating a fraud upon him to allow the other party to repudiate the contract, equity removes the agreement from the Statute of Frauds and enforces the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.