Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 NW2D 158 - State v. Nodes

State v. Nodes’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2013

6 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · Thiele v. Stich · Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation · Lange v. Johnson · Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[standing, as a jurisdictional defect, raises issues of justiciability. Izaak Walton League of Am. Endowment v. Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, 312 Minn. 587, 589 , 252 N.W.2d 852, 854 (1977) (justiciable controversy must exist for the court to have jurisdiction over a case). Objections to a party’s standing are essentially jurisdictional because the existence of a justiciable controversy underlies the court’s jurisdiction. In re Mullins, 298 N.W.2d 56 , 61 n. 7 (Minn.1980).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Jurisdictional defects include lack of adequate notice or personal jurisdiction, lack of territorial jurisdiction, and lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an order may not be collaterally attacked as unenforceable unless the absence of jurisdiction is clear on the face of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.