Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 NW2D 237 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2021

20 state decisions

1201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. United States · 98 Wash. 2d 358 - State v. Saltarelli · 101 Wash. 2d 772 - State v. Coe · Payne v. State · United States v. Ham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence is relevant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighs the probative value of the `evidence in view of the availability of other means of proof' and other factors under SDCL 19-12-3 (Rule 403).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.