Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 NW2D 659 - Hunt v. State

Hunt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weber v. Madison · Cutler v. Klass, Whicher & Mishne · Metier v. Cooper Transport Co., Inc. · Prouty v. Clayton County · Saunders Ex Rel. Saunders v. Dallas County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any action brought pursuant to this chapter, the state or a municipality shall not be assigned a percentage of fault for any of the following: 1. The failure to place, erect, or install a stop sign, traffic control device, or other regulatory sign as defined in the uniform manual for traffic control devices adopted pursuant to section 321.252. However, once a regulatory device has been placed, created or installed, the state or municipality may be assigned a percentage of fault for its failure to maintain the device.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.