Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

538 N.W.2d 778

Disciplinary Board v. Swanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1995-10-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2011

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER FOR DISCIPLINE

¶2On June 14, 1995, the Hearing Body filed its Report with the Disciplinary Board, finding that Glenn K. Swanson was named as Personal Representative of the Ruth M. Berge Estate and in addition to acting as Personal Representative, Swanson acted as an attorney for the estate. As legal representative for the Estate, Swanson was to receive reasonable compensation for legal services furnished to the estate in addition to compensation for acting as Personal Representative.

¶3The Hearing Body further found that Swanson did not timely prepare an inventory and appraisement for the estate and did not timely distribute the residuary assets of the estate to the trust created in the will. Swanson also failed to notify the Attorney General’s office that a charitable trust had been established by the Ruth M. Berge Estate.

¶4Swanson filed a Final Report and Account claiming Personal Representative fees and expenses totaling $79,411.65 less previous payments of $12,600.00 for a balance due of $66,811.65. Subsequently, Swanson, through his attorney, negotiated with the State of North Dakota and the Trustees to arrive at an agreed upon fee for services of $20,100.00 and filed an amendment to the Final Report and Account. The trial judge directed that the Final Report and Account as amended, be allowed and settled and that attorney’s fees and expenses and Personal Representative fees and expenses be paid.

¶5The Hearing Body found, by clear and convincing evidence, that Swanson violated Rule 1.3, North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct (NDRPC), which requires a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; that Swanson violated Rule 1.1, NDRPC, which requires a lawyer to provide a client with competent representation, which includes legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation necessary for the representation.

¶6The Hearing Body recommended a 90-day suspension of Swanson’s license to practice law and further recommended that Swanson pay costs and attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,925.30. On August 28, 1995, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court submitted its Report to the Supreme Court under Rule 3.1(F), North Dakota Procedural Rules for Lawyer Disability and Discipline (NDPRLDD), affirming the Findings and Recommendations of the Hearing Body.

¶7*779On September 29, 1995, the Disciplinary Board, through its counsel, Vivian E. Berg, and Swanson, through his attorney, Richard P. Olson, filed a Stipulation for resolution of this matter. In the Stipulation, the parties agreed that the Supreme Court may enter an Order in accord with the Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board. The Court considered the matter, and

¶8ORDERED, that the Stipulation is approved and that by signing it, Respondent Swanson admits in accordance with Rule 4.2, NDPRLDD, that:

(1) he consents to the discipline freely and voluntarily, there is no coercion or duress, and he is fully aware of the implications of his consent;
(2) he is aware that grounds for discipline exist as set forth in the Report of the Hearing Body;
(3) he acknowledges that the material facts are true;
and
(4) he knows that the charges cannot be successfully defended.

¶9IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Swanson is hereby suspended from the practice of law for 90 days from the date of this Order.

¶10IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Swanson pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceedings, in the amount of $5,925.30, payable to the Secretary of the Disciplinary Board.

¶11IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Swanson give notice of this suspension and provide proof of compliance in accordance with Rule 6.3, NDPRLDD.

/s/ Gerald W. Vande Walle GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice/s/ Herbert L. Meschke HERBERT L. MESCHKE, Justice/s/ Beryl J. Levine BERYL J. LEVINE, Justice/s/ Dale V. Sandstrom DALE V. SANDSTROM, JusticeNEUMANN, J., deeming himself disqualified, did not participate in this decision.
/538/nw2d/778 · .json · Public domain