538 So. 2d 121 - Zettle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1995
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Florida Bar Re Amendment to Article XI, Florida Bar Integration Rule (Rules of Discipline) · 445 So. 2d 398 - Cochenet v. State · 475 So. 2d 1336 - Helmholtz v. Helmholtz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For [the defendant] to have been convicted of first degree burglary under Section 810.02(2), Florida Statutes (1987), the information necessarily had to allege that appellant actually committed a battery or that he was armed or that he armed himself while in the structure. Regardless of the fact that appellant actually did commit a battery or that he was armed, the elements necessary for the crime for which appellant was convicted must be alleged in the charging count and cannot be borrowed from other counts of the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“with the intent to commit an offense therein, to wit: a battery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.