Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 So. 2d 136 - AC v. State

538 So. 2d 136 - AC v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2017

10 state decisions

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trushin v. State · 262 So. 2d 881 - Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Powell · 346 So. 2d 538 - State v. Dye · 375 So. 2d 840 - Downer v. State · 284 So. 2d 377 - State v. Lindsay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Any person who: (a)l. Is not a student, officer, or employee of a public school; 2. Does not have legitimate business on the campus or any other authorization, license, or invitation to enter or remain upon school property; or 3. Is not a parent, guardian, or person who has legal custody of a student enrolled at such school; or (b)l. Is a student currently under suspension or expulsion; or 2. Is an employee who is not required by his employment by the school to be on the campus or any other facility owned, operated, or controlled by the governing board of such school and who has no lawful purpose to be on such premises; and who enters or remains upon the campus or other facility of such school after the chief administrative officer of such school, or any employee thereof designated by him to maintain order on such campus or facility, has directed such person to leave such campus or facility or not to enter upon the same, is guilty of the offense of trespass upon the grounds of a public school facility and is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any purpose for being there which is connected with the operation of the school.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.