Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 So. 2d 21 - Cole v. Cole

538 So. 2d 21 - Cole v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 485 So. 2d 1174 - Lutz v. Lutz · Kabaci v. Kabaci · Sayles v. Sayles · 471 So. 2d 426 - Golson v. Golson · 379 So. 2d 614 - Tidwell v. Tidwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After an exhaustive search, we have been unable to find any authority for a court to treat an award of retirement benefits as either a property settlement or alimony in gross. In the absence of sound authority for so classifying such an award, we decide that such cannot be done by the courts of this state.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.