Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

538 So. 2d 514

538 So.2d 514

14 Fla.L.Weekly 394

State v. Morris

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-02-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1993

3 state decisions

Relies on 399 So. 2d 1137 - Vey v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc. · 301 So. 2d 7 - State v. Barber · 511 So. 2d 960 - State v. Ginebra

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-02-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The state appeals an order under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which granted Morris’ motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse.

¶2Morris moved to vacate her 1983 no contest plea to a charge of violation of section 893.13(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1981).1 As a procedural matter her Rule 3.850 motion is time-barred, and Rule 3.850 was unavailable to her in any event, as she was not “in custody under sentence of a court,” id., or under supervision, at the time her motion was brought. State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7, 10 (Fla.1974); see also Henzel v. State, 390 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981). In the event any further application for relief is made below, we note Morris’ principal ground for relief, that she was not advised of potential immigration law consequences of her plea, is foreclosed by State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla.1987).

¶3The order under Rule 3.850 is reversed.

¶4. The arrest affidavit alleged possession of thirty-six pounds of marijuana in appellee’s luggage, searched pursuant to consent at Miami International Airport.

/538/so2d/514 · .json · Public domain