¶1This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provisions without *545prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Fanning v. State, 537 So.2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
538 So. 2d 544
538 So.2d 544
14 Fla.L.Weekly 471
Christie v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 17, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-02-17
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1990
2 state decisions
Relies on Anders v. California · 444 So. 2d 947 - Jenkins v. State · 537 So. 2d 197 - Fanning v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-02-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →