538 So. 2d 833 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2018
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Johnson v. Mississippi · 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · Kamen v. Nordberg · 488 So. 2d 62 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the presence of a judge during trial is a fundamental right.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State · Ferrer v. Manning“Article I, section 16 of the Florida Constitution and the federal constitution’s sixth amendment guarantee criminal defendants trial by an impartial jury. The presence of a judge, who will insure the proper conduct of a trial, is essential to this guarantee.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State · Doe v. State“The presence of a judge, who will insure the proper conduct of a trial, is essential to the state and federally guaranteed rights of trial by an impartial jury. Although this right can be waived under some circumstances, such waiver must be “by a fully informed and advised defendant, and not by counsel acting alone.” Waiver of the trial judge’s presence cannot be implied because of a defendant’s failure to make a timely objection. Although defense counsel and the state attorney agreed to the judge’s absence in this case, the defendant Bryant did not because he was not consulted about this procedure by his attorney or the trial court. Thus, Bryant did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive the trial judge’s presence during the readback.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tovar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.