Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 So. 2d 931 - Solomon v. State

538 So. 2d 931 - Solomon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 93 So. 2d 105 - Smith v. City of Gainesville · State v. Demarzo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a) Whether the arresting law enforcement officer had reasonable cause to believe that the person had been driving or had been in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, chemical substances as set forth in s. 877.111, or controlled substances; b) [I]n the case of a breath or urine test, whether the person was placed under lawful arrest; c) [W]hether the person refused to submit to any such test after being requested to do so by a law enforcement officer; and d) [W]hether the person had been told that, if he refused to submit to such test, his privilege to operate a motor vehicle would be suspended for a period of 1 year, or for a period of 18 months if his driving privilege had been previously suspended for a refusal to submit to such test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.