538 So. 2d 960
538 So.2d 960
14 Fla.L.Weekly 509
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 21, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-02-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1990
1 state decisions
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 452 So. 2d 981 - Gardner v. Gardner
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-02-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1It was error not to require the wife to return to the husband a set of china which constituted his separate property and which he had brought into the marriage. See Gardner v. Gardner, 452 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In all other respects, the property distribution was equitable. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980).
¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.