Mayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 1999
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Young · 158 Tex. Crim. 367 - Nichlos v. State · Ex Parte Nichlos · Ex Parte Silva · Ex parte Farrington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order to obtain review by this court from an order of the trial court in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the object is the setting or reduction of bail, the habeas corpus applicant must invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court. This latter type proceeding is not subject to automatic review by this court under Article 11.07, (Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.); rather, it is subject to review under Article 44.34, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., after notice of appeal has been timely given in accordance with Article 44.08, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. See Ex parte Silva, 486 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), and cases cited under Annotation 23, Article 44.08, supra.” (Emphasis supplied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Weston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.