Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 SW3D 340 - Martin v. State

Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sanders v. State · Zink v. State · Charles K. Moore v. State of Missouri · Anderson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will defer to the motion court's determinations of credibility, and the motion court is free to believe all, part, or none of the witnesses' testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e will affirm the motion court's judgment so long as the motion court arrived at the correct result, regardless of how it got there.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “this Court is left with a definite and firm impression that a mistake has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.