Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 538 SW3D 819 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hobbs v. Gordon · Philyaw v. Kelley · Fields v. Hobbs · Crockett v. State · Hobbs v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Habeas corpus petitions are restricted to questions of whether the petitioner is in custody pursuant to a valid conviction or whether the convicting court had proper jurisdiction. Mere allegations do not establish probable cause. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus is not a substitute for post-conviction relief. A sufficiency of the evidence challenge is not a cognizable claim in a habeas action. Petitioner's challenge to the sufficiency of the charging instrument are not jurisdictional and should have been raised prior to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A habeas corpus proceeding does not afford a prisoner an opportunity to retry his case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.