Kaupp v. Texas’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
151 federal appellate · 65 district · 188 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 633 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2025 · most notably Yarborough v. Alvarado (2004), Hudson v. Michigan (2006)
151 federal appellate · 65 district · 188 state decisions — followed in 28 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Payton v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 633 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“taking into account all of the circumstances surrounding the encounter, the police conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that he was not at liberty to ignore the police presence and go about his business”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the length of time between the illegal seizure and the consent; (2) the presence of intervening circumstances; (3) the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct; and (4) whether the officers read the suspect his Miranda rights before he consented.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the threatening presence of several officers, the display of a weapon by an officer, some physical touching of the person of the citizen, or the use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer's request might be compelled.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.