Johnson v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis
539 F.2d 1111 · 1976
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2017 · most notably Califano v. Yamasaki (1979), Gurule v. Wilson (1980)
26 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Edelman v. Jordan · Goldberg v. Kelly · Perry v. Sindermann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * In such situation where the issue of the appropriateness of the action as a class action has not been considered in the district court, ‘the better practice, for reasons of judicial economy, [is] for the appellate court to make such a determination on the basis of the record before it, rather than remanding for a decision on this question.’ Caldwell v. Craighead, 432 F.2d 213, 216 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 953 , 91 S.Ct. 1617 , 29 L.Ed.2d 123 (1971). See also Locke v. Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach County, 499 F.2d 359, 365 (5th Cir. 1974).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Murphy v. Hiniker“interest in the continued payment of SSI benefits. See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970). 11 The Supreme Court in Board of Regents v. Roth specified: 12”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tatum v. Mathews“As with the Tucker Act, § 405(g) [the jurisdictional statute in the instant case] is only jurisdictional in nature and cannot itself constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity or confer the requisite substantive right. Such a waiver and right must be found, if at all, in the statutes creating the SSI program. 539 F.2d at 1123 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.