Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 F.2d 32 - United States v. Hufford

United States v. Hufford’s Empirical Analysis

539 F.2d 32 · 1976

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Knotts (1983), United States v. Dubrofsky (1978)

52 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

34019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Katz v. United States · Harris v. United States · Hester v. United States · United States v. White · Lopez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “see no distinction between visual surveillance and the use of an electronic beeper to aid the agents in following the movements of an automobile along public roads,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.