Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 F.2d 445 - United States v. Miller

United States v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

539 F.2d 445 · 1976

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
6
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently October 2002 · most notably United States v. Parr (1979), United States v. Martinez (1980)

35 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

2401976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 591

Relies on Gotthelf v. Commissioner · United States v. Gonware · United States v. Eisner · Stuyvesant Insurance v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(l)ike any other contract a bail bond should be construed to give effect to the reasonable intentions of the parties.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(the defendant is) to abide any judgment entered in such matter by surrendering himself to serve any sentence imposed and obeying any order or direction in connection with such judgment as the court imposing it may prescribe.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “]I]t is a common practice in the federal courts as well as the state courts, for defendants to request and for courts to grant short stays of execution of sentence to allow defendants to put their affairs in order before they start to serve their sentence. . . . Given this widespread practice, it is reasonable that the parties to this bail bond intended that the surety would remain liable during a reasonable stay of execution of the sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.