Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 F.3d 1176 - United States v. Easterday

United States v. Easterday’s Empirical Analysis

539 F.3d 1176 · 2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7202 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Neder v. United States · McCarthy v. United States · Spies v. United States · Cheek v. United States · Sansone v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The word “willfully” means a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty, and not through ignorance, mistake, negligence, even gross negligence, or accident. In other words, the defendant must have acted voluntarily and intentionally and with the specific intent to do something he knew the law prohibited; that is to say, with the intent either to disobey or disregard the law. In the context of this case, in order for the government to meet its burden of willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt, it must prove that on the dates the taxes were due the taxpayer possessed sufficient funds to be able to meet his legal obligations to the government or that the lack of sufficient funds on such date was created by (or was the result of) a voluntary and intentional act, without justification in light of the financial circumstances of the taxpayer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “This argument borders on the ridiculous .... [A] financial ability to pay the tax when it comes due is not a prerequisite to criminal liability under § 7203. Otherwise, a recalcitrant taxpayer could simply dissipate his liquid assets at or near the time when his taxes come due and thereby evade criminal liability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.