Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 F.3d 1334 - Holland v. State

Holland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

539 F.3d 1334 · 2008

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021 · most notably Holland v. Florida (2010), Holland v. Florida (2010)

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

180200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Lawrence v. Florida · Gerrow v. United States · Sandvik v. United States · Drew v. Department of Corrections · Frederick Steed v. Frederick Head Warden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n our view, no allegation of lawyer negligence or of failure to meet a lawyer’s standard of care — in the absence of an allegation and proof of bad faith, dishonesty, divided loyalty, mental impairment or so forth on the lawyer’s part — can rise to the level of egregious attorney misconduct that would entitle [the prisoner] to equitable tolling. Pure professional negligence is not enough.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.