McDougall v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4975 (§ 2003 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1106 (§ 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1203 (§ 3003 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Cruz v. Beto · Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co. · Eaves v. Penn · 485 F. Supp. 629 - Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.