Ramos v. Lamm’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 13 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Ramos v. Lamm (1983), Allstate Insurance Co. v. Huizar (2002)
4 federal appellate · 13 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 303 · 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (Consumer Home Mortgage Assistance Act of 1974) · 12 U.S.C. § 1786 · 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 12 U.S.C. § 1975 · 12 U.S.C. § 2607 · 12 U.S.C. § 3417
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Hutto v. Finney · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“attorney fees are proper for work done resolving the fee issue itself. Love v. Mayor of Cheyenne, Wyoming, 620 F.2d 235, 237 (10th Cir.1980). I conclude [, however,] that this should only be done for the attorney pursuing the application, not for all of the attorneys who are only acting as clients. [Thus,] [i]n this case only Mr. Kahn and ... [attorneys and paralegals working for Mr. Kahn] may properly bill for time [spent] on the attorney fee application^].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In this complex case it would be unreasonable to find that certain depositions were not necessary because they were not actually used at trial; likewise it would be unreasonable to find that copies were not necessary. In truth, it would have constituted malpractice if the plaintiffs’ attorneys had failed to take depositions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here the listing indicates that work on this case was done during travel time, the hours are properly included. However, where there is no indication that work on this case was done during the travel, the hours should not be included.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.