Hoagland v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1995

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1995-11-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1997

1 state decisions

Relies on Matter of Buckhalton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-11-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

¶3IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed.

¶4BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice