Manderfeld v. Krovitz’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2012
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thiele v. Stich · Cameron v. Evans · Alholm v. Wilt · Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. · Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[rjeformation is generally allowed against the original parties to an instru-mente,] * * * [t]he rule gives way ⅝ * ⅜ to the intervening rights of persons not parties to the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heim v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.