Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 P2D 28 - Woodruff v. State

Woodruff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2026

3 state decisions

10197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · Moulton v. State · Turnbow v. State · Parks v. State · 85 Okla. Crim. 14 - Bunn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he trial court properly admitted the evidence establishing the commission of another offense as showing a common scheme or plan. The offense for which the defendant was charged and the offense which was shown by the evidence in question were so closely related to each other that proof of one tended to establish the other. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.