Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 P2D 361 - Tobin v. Pursel

Tobin v. Pursel’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1994

19 state decisions

80197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wheeler v. Bullington · Watson v. Claughton · Gardner v. Walker · Parr v. City of Seattle · Big Horn Coal Company v. SHERIDAN-WYO. COAL COMPANY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not only within the power of this court, but the duty of the court, to notice and act upon jurisdictional matters even though not raised by the parties or the court below. Big Horn Coal Co. v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co., 67 Wyo. 300 , 224 P.2d 172, 177 ; Wyoming State Treasurer ex rel. Workmen’s Compensation Department v. Niestwaag, Wyo., 444 P.2d 327, 328 ; Bowman v. Wor-land School District, Wyo., 531 P.2d 889, 890 ; and Gardner v. Walker, Wyo., 373 P.2d 598, 599 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Any person interested under a deed, will, written contract or other writings constituting a contract, or whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected by a statute, municipal ordinance, contract or franchise, may have determined any question of construction or validity arising under the instrument, statute, ordinance, contract, or franchise and obtain a declaration of rights, status or other legal relations thereunder." [Emphasis supplied]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"* * * that the requirements of [the Declaratory Judgments Act], directing that the attorney general shall be `served with a copy of the proceeding' and `be entitled to be heard' are mandatory and go to the jurisdiction of the court, and that the failure to comply with the mandates renders any lower court order void." 539 P.2d at 366 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.