539 So. 2d 1008 - State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2000
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 454 So. 2d 93 - State v. Nuccio · 405 So. 2d 506 - In re Tucker · 416 So. 2d 109 - State v. Broussard · 363 So. 2d 458 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“filed formal waiver of rights form and was advised by the court as per Boykin .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robair · State v. Morgan“upon conviction a defendant is entitled to know the full consequences of the verdict within a reasonable time. Since the enhancement of the penalty provision is incidental to the latest conviction, the proceeding to sentence under that provision should not be unduly delayed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A habitual offender proceeding under LSA R.S. 15:529.1 is an enhancement of penalty proceeding, not a prosecution for a crime. State v. Scott, 395 So.2d 714 (La.1981); State v. Alexander, 503 So.2d 782 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987). As such, it is not governed by defendant's right to have an expeditious determination of guilt. State v. Johnson, 363 So.2d 458 (La.1978); State v. Alexander, supra . Rather, principles of fundamental fairness dictated by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibit inordinate delays in post-conviction proceedings such as imposition of sentence. State v. Duncan, 396 So.2d 297 (La. 1981); State v. Alexander, supra . Id. at 1010.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.