Clanton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Check · United States v. Quinto · 484 So. 2d 1002 - Gates v. State · 492 So. 2d 1281 - Watts v. State · 437 So. 2d 37 - Pennington v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“most especially ... since Clanton did not testify himself, and there is no testimony in the record before the jury that Carpenter [the victim] consented to this sexual activity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Clanton, pre-trial, vigorously opposed the statements being offered into evidence by the State, which the court overruled. The State, however, at trial made no effort to offer either into evidence. Clanton did not testify in his own behalf, and no witnesses were offered by the defense. Clanton did seek to introduce the two statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Clearly, hearsay statements such as these are inadmissible when there has been no testimony of any kind offered to support them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.