Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SO2D 132 - Gangl v. State

Gangl v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State (1994), 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State (2003)

1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · 478 So. 2d 1017 - Harper v. State · Lee v. State · 455 So. 2d 727 - Wilcher v. State · 486 So. 2d 360 - Malone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “lesser offense instructions should not be granted indiscriminately, and only where there is an evidentiary basis in the record.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Trigg v. State · Brazzle v. State
  2. “(1) a completed felony has been committed; (2) the accused concealed, received, relieved, aided, or assisted a felon, knowing that such person had committed a felony; and (3) such assistance or aid was rendered with the intent to enable such felon to escape or avoid arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment after the commission of such felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Dampier v. State · 852 So. 2d 43 - McClendon v. State
  3. “An accessory after the fact is a person assisting one who has completed the commission of a felony to avoid being apprehended, arrested, convicted, etc.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State · 731 So. 2d 1115 - Slater v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.