Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SO2D 264 - Hurst v. Capitell

Hurst v. Capitell’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
9
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2011

21 state decisions

1501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dunlap v. Dunlap · Hewlett v. George · Owens v. Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. · 453 So. 2d 735 - Lloyd v. Service Corp. of Alabama · Hill v. Giordano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o leave children who are victims of such wrongful, intentional, heinous acts without a right to redress those wrongs in a civil action is unconscionable. . . .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “`[b]ecause the doctrine was judicially created, it is not exclusively a legislative issue and it may be judicially qualified,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “"`"While the preferred method for modification of a rule of law is by legislative action, it is clearly within the power of the judiciary, and, at times appropriate for the judiciary, to change an established rule of law.... "`"... [W]here a judicial creation has become outmoded or unjust in application it is more often appropriate for the judicial body to act to modify the law."'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.