¶1Affirmed. See and compare Schreidell v. Shoter, 500 So.2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); McIver v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc., 489 So.2d 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Delgado-Santos v. State, 471 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); approved 497 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1986); From v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc., 400 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Association, Inc., 362 So.2d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Oskierko, 334 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Morceau v. Meader, 179 So.2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974); Loeb v. Globe Newspaper Co., 489 F.Supp. 481 (D.Mass.1980).
539 So. 2d 36
Valdes v. Nateman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 14, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-03-14
Relies on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · 400 So. 2d 52 - From v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc. · 273 So. 2d 774 - Wolfson v. Kirk
Decided 1989-03-14