Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 So. 2d 400 - Cephus v. State

539 So. 2d 400 - Cephus v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Monroe v. Blackburn · 487 So. 2d 999 - Page v. State · 478 So. 2d 332 - Knight v. State · 460 So. 2d 331 - Henderson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The scope of cross-examination in a criminal proceeding is within the discretion of the trial judge and it is not reviewable except for the trial judge's prejudicial abuse of discretion. Jackson v. State , Ala. Cr. App., 353 So.2d 40 , cert. denied, 353 So.2d 48 (1977). McFerrin v. State , Ala. Cr. App., 339 So.2d 127 (1976). The right to a thorough and sifting cross-examination of a witness does not extend to matters that are collateral or immaterial and the trial judge is within his discretion in limiting questions which are of that nature. McLaren v. State , Ala. Cr. App. 353 So.2d 24 , cert. denied, 353 So.2d 35 (1977); McDonald v. State , Ala. Cr. App., 340 So.2d 103 (1976)".”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.