Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SO2D 514 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Charles · 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · Grant v. State · 506 So. 2d 1039 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 6C(1) · 172 So. 2d 824 - Hedges v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would place an unrealistically severe burden upon trial judges concerning a matter which should properly be within the province and responsibility of defense counsel as a matter of trial tactics and strategy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... committed by accident and misfortune during any lawful act ..., or by accident or misfortune in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation, or upon any sudden combat, without any dangerous weapon being used....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “where a jurisdictional error appears or where the interests of justice present a compelling demand for its application.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.