Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SO2D 937 - Rosell v. Esco

Rosell v. Esco’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1993
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · Canter v. Koehring Company · Wilson v. Hibernia Nat. Bank · 354 So. 2d 746 - Leaber v. Jolley Elevator Corp. · Landry v. National Gypsum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “provided uncontradicted testimony that the elevator doors could not have closed suddenly as an isolated incident but [would have] had to manifest ... sudden closing immediately prior to and after the accident”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile there is little doubt that Ms. Rosell sustained an injury, much doubt exists as to how the doors could have possibly closed too fast”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “certain [former] employees who claimed to have witnessed past problems with the elevator doors closing too fast,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.