Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SO2D 965 - Hughes v. McKenzie

Hughes v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2017

15 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Quilloin v. Walcott · State v. Burton · Wood v. Beard · State Ex Rel. Paul v. Peniston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any other circumstances, such as prolonged separation of the child from its natural parents, that would cause the child to suffer substantial harm.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The right of a parent to his child existed before governments or other social institutions of mankind. This natural right proceeds from our Creator and exists independently of the state; the state ... does not in my humble opinion possess the power to take away in favor of a stranger the God-given right of a parent to his child, in the absence of the parent's forfeiture or abandonment of such right or of positive detriment to the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Of the Provisional Proceedings to Which a Suit for Separation or Divorce May Give Occasion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.