State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1980
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Canty v. Board of Education · State v. Thompson · State v. Achter · State v. Keeney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Concerning the refused instruction on stealing from a person, it has long been held that the court need not instruct on such offense if the evidence is sufficient to make a submissible case on the charge of first degree robbery with a dangerous and deadly weapon, [citing] State v. Gideon, 453 S.W.2d 938, 940 [10] (Mo.1970); State v. Keeney, 425 S.W.2d 85, 89 [4] (Mo.1968). Under the evidence defend ant was clearly guilty of robbery in the first degree or guilty of no offense at all. Alibi was the only defense. Appellant’s proffered instruction was properly refused, [citing] State v. Whalen, 148 Mo. 286 , 49 S.W. 989, 990 [3] (1899); State v. Thompson, 299 S.W.2d 468, 474 [16] (Mo.1957).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.