Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SW2D 669 - McIlroy v. Hamilton

McIlroy v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2004

22 state decisions

1001976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · State ex rel. West v. Diemer · Teters v. Kansas City Public Service Company · McDougall v. Castelli · George v. Dickinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Proof of open, notorious, continuous, and uninterrupted use for the requisite ten year period, in the absence of evidence to explain how the use began, raises a presumption that the use was adverse and under a claim of right, thereby casting upon the owner of the servient estate the burden of showing that the use was permissive and by virtue of some license, indulgence or agreement inconsistent with the claim of right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The adverse use of land with respect to the creation of an easement by prescription is one which does not recognize in those as against whom it is claimed to be adverse any authority either to prevent or permit continuance of the use. It is the nonrecognition of the authority at the time the use is made which determines whether the use is an adverse one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.