Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 S.W.2d 741 - Suesserman v. Suesserman

Suesserman v. Suesserman’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 1998

18 state decisions

90197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lange v. Baker · Parking Systems, Inc. v. Kansas City Downtown Redevelopment Corp. · Wykle v. Colombo · Fuzzell v. Williams · L_ J_ S v. V_ H_ S

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a proceeding for nonretroactive invalidity, dissolution of marriage, legal separation, maintenance, or child support, the court may order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child of the marriage to pay an amount reasonable or necessary for his support, without regard to marital misconduct, after considering all relevant factors including: (1) The father’s primary responsibility for support of his child; (2) The financial resources of the child; (3) The financial resources of the custodial parent; (4) The standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not been dissolved; (5) The physical and emotional condition of the child, and his educational needs; and (6) The financial resources and needs of the noncustodial parent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.