Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SW2D 887 - Shaw v. State

Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2018

24 state decisions

11019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Hill · Valdez v. State · Ex Parte Griffith · Foley v. State · Chaney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before any unfavorable nunc pro tunc orders are entered the person convicted should be given an opportunity to be present for the hearing, represented by counsel, in order to accord him due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.