Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SW3D 321 - Shortt v. State

Shortt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3561

Relies on Manuel v. State · Speth v. State · Nix v. State · Cartwright v. State · Basaldua v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To avoid ... confusion, we could hold that the appeal from the order granting 'shock' community supervision is independent of the appeal from the original written judgment-a separate appeal of the order suspending the execution of the sentence, with its own appellate timetable, but subject to being consolidated with the appeal from the original written judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “will be granted pursuant to an order on a motion, brought by either party or by the trial court sua sponte , well after the written judgment has been entered”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “statutory scheme does not contemplate that the trial court enter a new judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.