Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 SW3D 841 - Chastain v. Geary

Chastain v. Geary’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of St. Louis v. Hughes · Pirtle v. Cook · Allison v. Sverdrup & Parcel & Associates, Inc. · Brooks v. Brooks · Wills v. Whitlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Despite the well-discussed concerns and uncertainties attendant to the use of nunc pro tunc amendments to convert a previous ruling into a final judgment, our Supreme Court has allowed an appeal to proceed where 'it [was] clear that the trial court intended to finalize the judgment for purposes of appeal' by entering a nunc pro tunc order to retitle an order as a judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny party to a suit aggrieved by any judgment of any trial court in any civil cause from which an appeal is not prohibited ... may take his or her appeal to a court having appellate jurisdiction from any ... [f]inal judgment in the case ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “assist the litigants and the appellate courts by clearly distinguishing when orders and rulings of the [circuit] court are intended to be final and appealable and when the [circuit] court seeks to retain jurisdiction over the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.