Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 54 ALA 520 - Levison v. State

Levison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
8
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently May 2001 · most notably Dennison v. State (1953), Storey v. State (1882)

69 state decisions

12018751880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brister v. State · Johnson v. State · Carroll v. State · Aaron v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is often a matter of great delicacy and extreme difficulty, to determine, in a criminal cause, whether a particular fact, not bearing directly on the issue involved, can be received as evidence. The rule is' clear and well' defined that facts and circumstances, which, when proved, are incapable of affording any reasonable presumption or inference in regard to the material fact or inquiry involved, are not admissible as evidence. The difficulty lies in its application.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The first confession is regarded as the parent of the succeeding confessions, and that being improperly obtained, vitiates the second, unless it appears the influence extracting the first has been removed, and all connection between the two dissevered." [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““When the jury find the defendant guilty under an indictment for murder, they must ascertain, by their verdict, whether it is murder in the first or second degree.” Code 1907, § 7087.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.